Implant Inclination and Horizontal Misfit in Metallic Bar Framework of Overdentures: Analysis By 3D-FEA Method.

The aim of this study was to evaluate by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA) the biomechanics involved in bar-framework system for overdentures. The studied factors were latero-lateral angulation in the right implant (-10, -5, 0, 5 and 10 degrees), and different bar cross-sections (circular, Hader and oval) presenting horizontal misfits (50 or 150 µm) on the opposite implant. Positive angulation (5 and 10 degrees) for implant inclination to mesial position, negative angulation (-5 and -10 degrees) for distal position, and zero degree for parallel implants. The von Mises stresses evaluated the bar, screw and the implant; maximum principal, minimum principal and shear stress analyses evaluated the peri-implant bone tissue. Parallel implants provide lower stress in alveolar bone tissue; mesial inclined bars showed the most negative effect on prosthetic structures and implants. In conclusion, bar cross-section showed no influence on stress distribution for peri-implant bone tissue, and circular bar provided better behavior to the prosthetic system. Higher stress concentration is provided to all system as the misfit increases.

Implant inclination and horizontal misfit in metallic bar framework of overdentures: analysis by 3d-fea method

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate by three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA) the biomechanics involved in bar-framework system for overdentures. The studied factors were latero-lateral angulation in the right implant (-10, -5, 0, 5 and 10 degrees), and different bar cross-sections (circular, Hader and oval) presenting horizontal misfits (50 or 150 µm) on the opposite implant. Positive angulation (5 and 10 degrees) for implant inclination to mesial position, negative angulation (-5 and -10 degrees) for distal position, and zero degree for parallel implants. The von Mises stresses evaluated the bar, screw and the implant; maximum principal, minimum principal and shear stress analyses evaluated the peri-implant bone tissue. Parallel implants provide lower stress in alveolar bone tissue; mesial inclined bars showed the most negative effect on prosthetic structures and implants. In conclusion, bar cross-section showed no influence on stress distribution for peri-implant bone tissue, and circular bar provided better behavior to the prosthetic system. Higher stress concentration is provided to all system as the misfit increases.

Resumo O objetivo neste estudo foi avaliar por meio do método por elemento finito tridimensional (3D-AEF) a biomecânica envolvida na infraestrutura do sistema barra-clipe para overdentures. Os fatores de estudo foram inclinação mésio-distal entre implantes (-10, -5, 0, 5, 10 graus) e diferentes seções transversais da barra metálica (circular, oval e Hader) com desajuste horizontal (50 e 150 µm). Valores de inclinação positivas (5 e 10 graus) indicam inclinação do implante para mesial e valores negativos (-5 e -10 graus) mostram inclinação para distal, enquanto zero grau indica implantes paralelos. Valores de tensões equivalentes de von Mises foram utilizadas nos sistemas barra, parafuso e implante. Tensão máxima e mínima principal, e cisalhante foram utilizadas para análise do osso alveolar peri-implante. Implantes paralelos promoveram menores tensões em tecido peri-implante; as inclinações para mesial apresentaram piores resultados para as estruturas protéticas e implantes. As diferentes seções transversais da barra não mostraram influência na distribuição de tensões no osso alveolar peri-implante. Concluindo, a barra circular apresentou melhores resultados para os componentes protéticos e maiores valores de tensões foram observados em todos os modelos na medida que o desajuste aumentou.

Influence of the base and diluent monomer on network characteristics and mechanical properties of neat resin and composite materials.

This study evaluated the effect of the combination of two dimethacrylate-based monomers [bisphenol A diglycidyl dimethacrylate (BisGMA) or bisphenol A ethoxylated dimethacrylate (BisEMA)] with diluents either derived from ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, diethylene glycol dimethacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate) or 1,10-decanediol dimethacrylate (D3MA) on network characteristics and mechanical properties of neat resin and composite materials. The degree of conversion, maximum rate of polymerization and water sorption/solubility of unfilled resins and the flexural strength and microhardness of composites (after 24 h storage in water and 3 months storage in a 75 vol% ethanol aqueous solution) were evaluated. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). The higher conversion and lower water sorption presented by BisEMA co-polymers resulted in greater resistance to degradation in ethanol compared with BisGMA-based materials. In general, conversion and mechanical properties were optimized with the use of long-chain dimethacrylate derivatives of ethylene glycol. D3MA rendered more hydrophobic materials, but with relatively low conversion and mechanical properties.

Effect of irradiance and light source on contraction stress, degree of conversion and push-out bond strength of composite restoratives.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of five curing methods on contraction stress, stress rate, and degree of conversion (DC) of a composite and on bond strength of composite restoratives. METHODS: For the stress test, composite was applied between two 5-mm diameter glass rods, mounted in a servohydraulic machine. Stress rates were calculated as the change in stress vs. time. DC was measured by FTIR. Bond strength testing was performed using a push-out test in bovine incisors. The C-factor was 3.0 for all tests. Five methods were evaluated: High Intensity LED (LED HI), Continuous Halogen Light (QTH CL), Medium Intensity LED (LED MI), Low Intensity LED (LED LI), and Pulse Delay Halogen Light (QTH PD). Results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Stress values ranged from 9.25 MPa (QTH PD) to 10.46 MPa (LED MI). No statistical difference was observed among the methods. Bond strength values ranged from 24.6 MPa (LED HI) to 35.4 MPa (QTH PD), with the QTH PD presenting a statistically higher value compared to the other methods. Stress rate and bond strength presented an inverse linear correlation (r2 = 0.79). LED HI presented the highest maximum stress rate, followed by LED MI, QTH CL, LED LI, and QTH PD. The reduction in stress rate observed for the low intensity groups was associated with a general increase in bond strength, with no adverse effect on the degree of conversion of the restorative composite.

Modulated photoactivation methods: Influence on contraction stress, degree of conversion and push-out bond strength of composite restoratives.

OBJECTIVES: Verify the influence of curing methods on contraction stress, stress rate, and degree of conversion (DC) of a restorative composite and on bond strength of composite restoratives. METHODS: For the stress test, composite (0.84 mm thick) was applied between two 5-mm diameter glass rods, mounted in a servohydraulic machine. Stress rate was taken by the value of stress/time at each second. DC was measured by micro-FTIR. Bond strength testing was performed using a push-out test. The C-factor in all tests was 3.0. Four curing methods were tested: continuous light (CL), soft-start (SS), and two pulse delay methods using different initial irradiances--150 mW/cm(2) (PD150) and 80 mW/cm(2) (PD80). Results were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Stress values ranged from 7.9 MPa (PD80) to 10.3 MPa (CL). No statistical difference was verified among CL, SS, and PD150. PD80 presented statistically lower stress values compared to CL and SS. CL presented the highest maximum stress rate, followed by SS, PD150 and PD80. Mean DC values ranged from 54.2% (PD150) to 55.9% (PD80), with no difference observed among the methods. For the bond strength test, values ranged from 26.4 MPa (CL) to 35.5 MPa (PD150). PD150 and PD80 were both statistically superior to SS and CL. SS presented statistically higher bond strength compared to CL. CONCLUSIONS: Modulated curing methods were shown to be effective in reducing contraction stress rate and improving the strength of the bonded interface, and without compromising the DC of the restorative composite.

Pulse-delay curing: influence of initial irradiance and delay time on shrinkage stress and microhardness of restorative composites.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the influence of pulse-delay curing on shrinkage stress and microhardness of 2 restorative composites (Herculite XRV and Tetric Ceram). METHODS: Two pulse irradiances (500 and 100 mW/cm2) were applied for 1 or 5 seconds, respectively (radiant exposure = 0.5 J/cm2). In both cases, photoactivation was completed applying 500 mW/cm2 for 39 seconds after a delay time of 0, 1 or 3 minutes. Shrinkage stress was monitored for 10 minutes in specimens 5-mm in diameter by 1-mm in height. Knoop hardness (KHN) was used to estimate the degree of conversion 10 minutes after photoactivation and after 48 hours of storage in distilled water (37 degrees C) in specimens with similar geometry and dimensions. Additional KHN readings after 4 8 hoursof storage in ethanol (37 degrees C) were used to estimate polymer structure. The results were evaluated using ANOVA/Tukey test and Student t-test (a=0.05). RESULTS: For Tetric Ceram, 3-minute delay led to stress reduction compared to continuous curing at 500 mW/cm2 (4.7+/-0.6 MPa and 7.0+/-1.3 MPa, respectively). At 100 mW/cm2, 1 minute delay was enough to cause significant stress reduction (5.2+/-0.5 MPa). For Herculite, the pulse with 3 minute delay led to stress reduction compared to no delay for both irradiances (100 mW/cm2: 6.3+/-0.5 MPa and 7.8+/-0.8 MPa, respectively; 500 mW/cm2: 6.4+/-0.3 MPa and 7.8+/-0.7 MPa, respectively). At 10 minutes, only small differences in microhardness were observed for both materials. No differences were found after water and ethanol storage (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The composites behaved differently when subjected to pulse curing. Stress reduction was influenced by delay time but not by pulse irradiance. KHN results suggest that similar degrees of conversion and polymer structure were achieved with the photoactivation methods tested.